Action Planning Template
|
||||
Goal: Determine what the most economically and
instructionally feasible model for double blocking our secondary students in
English in order to improve reading and writing across the district/
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
Collect enrollment
numbers, and ELA Staffing numbers for 6-12th at each campus across
the district.
|
Erica Ysbrand (HS ELA
Curriculum Director) Shirley Wright (MS ELA Curriculum Director), Louis
Harvill
|
December/January 2012
|
Enrollment numbers
|
Enrollment Spreadsheet
Staffing Spreadsheet
|
Interview department
heads and curriculum directors to gauge support for Double Blocking
|
Louis Harvill
|
January 2013
|
Surveymonkey
|
Survey Data
|
Review Literature,
develop several logistically sound models
|
Louis Harvill
|
February 2013
|
University Research
Databases, Excel, manipulatives
|
Spreadsheets
|
Present Models for
feedback from Curriculum Directors and Department Heads
|
Louis Harvill
|
March/Apri 2013l
|
Livebinder, Survey Monkey
|
Survey results
|
With approval, pitch
best model to district principals
|
Louis Harvill
|
June 2013
|
PowerPoint,
Moodle
|
Notes, feedback,
moodle
|
If campuses accept,
assist in implementation of Double-Blocked ELA
|
Louis Harvill
|
June/July/August 2013
|
TEAMS, face to face
|
Master Schedules
|
Survey teachers.
Administrators, department heads on pilot campuses
|
Louis Harvill
|
December/January 2013
|
Survey Monkey, face to
face
|
Survey results, notes
from face to face
|
Analyze STAAR Data for
evidence of improvement
|
Louis Harvill
|
May 2014
|
District Data database
|
Spreadsheets
|
Friday, December 7, 2012
Action Research Plan
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Research: Questions, Reflection, and Profession
This
week gave us the opportunity to see a lot of examples of action research
topics, and spend a lot of time reflecting on what we want to do for our own
research.
This
set of assignments came at a very appropriate time for me. I spent Wednesday through Friday at a
conference hosted by the Texas Association for Gifted and Talented (TAGT) in
downtown Dallas.
There
were a wide range of excellent presenters, giving presentations on everything
from Curriculum and Instruction to Program Design and Implementation, to the
Social and Emotional needs of learners.
The
sessions I sat in on gave me a lot of great tools to take back to teachers, but
also presented a lot of research that had been done by educators to determine
best practices for gifted students. They
also reminded me some of the reasons I got into education, and I had an
opportunity to speak with a lot of administrators about their experience in
their education careers.
Through
the course of the reading, and the course of the conference, I found some goals
and some areas of interest for myself. I
know that one thing I want to continue to work on is helping my district
improve cooperation between the Social Studies and ELA departments in order to
increase student performance.
I
also spent a lot of time thinking about how data was presented and how research
was done, and whether or not those processes had produced valid, applicable,
verifiable, repeatable data. All of
those are important factors to consider about the research design for my Action
Research Project.
Overall
it was a really good week for me professionally, and in addition to the
readings I had a lot of great experiences.
P.S.
If anyone’s looking for some great resources for using technology in
instruction, I highly recommend http://www.brianhousand.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)